Legal Opinion

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 2010No. Civ-10-50-WPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEE R. WEST, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment, as amended, filed pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., by plaintiffs Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and Chickasaw Nation (collectively “Nations”). Defendant State of Oklahoma (“State”) has responded.

Summary judgment as requested by the Nations “should be rendered if ... [the record] show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movantfs] ... [are] entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Rule 56(c)(2), F.R.Civ.P. An issue of fact is genuine if the issue could be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Fisher v. Oklahoma Health Care AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation v. WagnonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Griffith v. Choctaw Casino of PocolaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Muhammad v. Comanche Nation CasinoDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API