Legal Opinion

Place v. City of Waterbury

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 16, 2001No. AC 20937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

This civil appeal concerns the relationship between staff members of a federally funded regional agency and the city, within the agency’s service area, that administers the agency’s grant money. At issue is whether the city must make fiscal contributions to a deferred compensation plan that agency staff members chose to fund their pensions. That question, in turn, depends upon whether the staff members were city employees for pension purposes.1 In a careful and comprehensive memorandum of decision, the trial *221court found that they were not and, accordingly, rendered judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Doyle v. KuleszaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Nelson v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Morgan Buildings & Spas, Inc. v. Dean's Stoves & Spas, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 111 Whitney Avenue, Inc. v. Commissioner of Mental RetardationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. In re Darien S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Douthwright v. Northeast Corridor FoundationsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Barton v. City of Waterbury, No. 0452930 S (Nov. 20, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API