Place v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
This civil appeal concerns the relationship between staff members of a federally funded regional agency and the city, within the agency’s service area, that administers the agency’s grant money. At issue is whether the city must make fiscal contributions to a deferred compensation plan that agency staff members chose to fund their pensions. That question, in turn, depends upon whether the staff members were city employees for pension purposes.1 In a careful and comprehensive memorandum of decision, the trial *221court found that they were not and, accordingly, rendered judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Doyle v. KuleszaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Nelson v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Morgan Buildings & Spas, Inc. v. Dean's Stoves & Spas, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- 111 Whitney Avenue, Inc. v. Commissioner of Mental RetardationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- In re Darien S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Douthwright v. Northeast Corridor FoundationsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Barton v. City of Waterbury, No. 0452930 S (Nov. 20, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001