Legal Opinion

Interborough Rapid Transit Co. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1916Published

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtGavegan, J.

The action is to permanently restrain the defendants from removing certain additions to the elevated railway stations consisting of, first, extensions of the station platforms to adjoining buildings at Fourteenth, Eighteenth, Twenty-third and Thirty-third streets and Sixth avenue, and, second, bridges crossing the street and connecting north and south bound stations at Rector and Cortlandt streets. The board of estimate - and apportionment directed their removal on the ground that they constituted an illegal and unauthorized use of the public streets. The defendants do not dispute the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sundstrom v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Auchincloss v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Rothschild & Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API