Legal Opinion

Henry v. Hemstreet

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 1952No. 34133PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. As declaratory of the common law, it is provided in Code § 4-103: “Whatever one may do himself may be done by an agent.” The petition as amended alleged that the services of nursing and caring for Mrs. Doseher were rendered by the plaintiff, through her agents, Louise Thomas and Clara Watkins. “In the normal course of human affairs where one person renders a service valuable to another which is accepted by the latter, he does so either under an express or implied promise of the recipient of such service to pay for the service, or the service is rendered gratuitously. Among members of a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Jenkins v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Kemp v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. McRae v. BrittonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API