Legal Opinion

Dykes v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 21, 1980No. WCB 78-6306, CA 16209PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This appeal presents a single issue of statutory interpretation, namely, what is the meaning of the term "services for a remuneration” in defining who is a "worker” covered by the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Claimant appeals from a denial by both the referee and the Workers’ Compensation Board of his claim for an injury sustained while performimg a physical agility test in the course of trying out for a position as a deputy sheriff of Jackson County. The basis for the denial was that at the time of the claimed injury claimant was not performing services "for a remuneration” as required by ORS…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Younger v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Dodson v. Workers' Compensation DivisionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. BBC Brown Boveri v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Bugryn v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Good Samaritan Hospital, Inc. v. JacobsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API