Dykes v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This appeal presents a single issue of statutory interpretation, namely, what is the meaning of the term "services for a remuneration” in defining who is a "worker” covered by the Workers’ Compensation Law.
Claimant appeals from a denial by both the referee and the Workers’ Compensation Board of his claim for an injury sustained while performimg a physical agility test in the course of trying out for a position as a deputy sheriff of Jackson County. The basis for the denial was that at the time of the claimed injury claimant was not performing services "for a remuneration” as required by ORS…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Younger v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Dodson v. Workers' Compensation DivisionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- BBC Brown Boveri v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Bugryn v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Good Samaritan Hospital, Inc. v. JacobsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.