Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jessica Tavares v. Gene Whitehouse

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2017No. 14-15814Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWardlaw, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority that we lack habeas jurisdiction over the UAIC’s withholding orders, and that the expired two-year banishment orders against Dolly and Barbara Suehead and Dona Caesar should be dismissed as moot. However, I conclude that Jessica Tavares’s ten-year banishment order severely restrains her liberty and constitutes “detention” under the Indian Civil Rights Act (“ICRA”). Therefore, I respectfully disagree with the majority’s holding that we lack jurisdiction to entertain her habeas petition.

Tavares is a longtime leader of the UAIC. She served on the Tribal Council from…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API