Legal Opinion
Chang v. Daniels (In Re Daniels)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided October 14, 1988No. Bankruptcy No. 87-4123-8B7, Adv. No. 87-427PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THOMAS E. BAYNES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff George Chang. On October 29, 1987, Plaintiff filed an adversary proceeding seeking a determination that a stipulated final judgment entered by a State of California court was nondischargeable under Section 523(a)(2)(A). The gravamen of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is collateral estoppel.
The Plaintiff’s basis for issue preclusion is paragraph 3 of the certified “Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Judgment…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Tricentrol Overseas, Ltd. v. Touchstone (In Re Touchstone)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1993
- Lasky v. Itzler (In Re Itzler)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2000
- Blashke v. Standard (In Re Standard)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1991
- Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Cohen (In Re Cohen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Johnson v. Keene (In Re Keene)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.