Legal Opinion
Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. v. MiTek Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 16, 2024No. 5:20-cv-06957Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 SIMPSON STRONG-TIE COMPANY Case No. 20-cv-06957-VKD INC., 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 10 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES; v. DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL 11 MITEK INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 200, 201, 204 12 Defendant. 13 14 After prevailing against plaintiff Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. (“Simpson”) in a 15 bench trial, defendant MiTek, Inc. (“MiTek”) asks the Court to award it attorney’s fees under the 16 Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505. Dkt. No. 200. MiTek argues that Simpson’s unreasonable 17…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Thomas GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Glacier Films (Usa), Inc. v. Andrey TurchinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.