Legal Opinion

Sennett v. Insurance Co. of North America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1968No. Appeals, 358 and 359PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This proceeding was initiated by petition of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth) seeking to compel the Insurance Company of North America1 (INA) to pay certain allegedly escheatable *528items of personal property held by it into tbe State Treasury.2 Although originally the petition referred to eleven different classes of personalty, the present appeals involve only three: (1) uncollected wages, (2) proceeds of uncashed checks and drafts and (3) so-called “deposits” on perpetual fire insurance policies.

The lower court upheld the Commonwealth with respect…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cole v. National Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Department of Revenue v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Treasurer & Receiver General v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Kane v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API