Legal Opinion
People v. Windley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 11, 1980PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ross, J.
The facts as detailed by our dissenting colleagues are sufficiently accurate so as not to require repetition here. At issue before us is whether the defendant was an agent of the purchaser, the undercover police officer, and whether the trial court’s charge on the defense of agency was prejudicial to this defendant so as to require reversal of his conviction for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. We have concluded that defendant was not an agent *56of the purchaser, but rather played an active role as seller of the contraband. Additionally,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. ArgibayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. PageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. RayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. AnthonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.