Legal Opinion

Throgmorton v. Trammell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1953No. 34662PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Code § 70-306 provides as follows: “In all applications for a new trial the opposite party shall be served with a copy of the rule nisi, unless such copy is waived.” As appears from the statement of facts, an acknowledgment of service, reciting merely "Due and legal service of the within motion and order acknowledged; copy received”, signed by counsel for the plaintiff and dated October 16, 1952, was had of the motion for new trial and rule nisi, which, however, were not filed until October 18, *4681952. There was no further attempt to serve the plaintiff or obtain an acknowledgment of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Martin v. MonroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Hilt v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Gould v. Johnston & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Shirley v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trammell v. ThrogmortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API