Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael J. Fields, United States of America v. James P. Bramble, United States of America v. Vincent MacPherson
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 12, 1989No. 87-1748, 87-1749 and 87-1758PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATKINS, Senior District Judge.
The appellants James Bramble, Michael Fields, and Vincent MacPherson attack their convictions for conspiracy, bank robbery, and Hobbs Act violations asserting six grounds of error. Because this court finds no error in the trial proceedings, the convictions are affirmed.
On April 1, 1983, three men, masked and armed, robbed the Central Savings Bank of Lowell, Massachusetts, and escaped with $65,791 in cash. On April 14, 1983, four men robbed an armored car during its morning delivery to the Fall River Trust Company in Fall River, Massachusetts, netting $140,430 in…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Pedro N. Soto and Edwin F. GotayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. DavidCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Thomas YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.