Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holliman v. Cole

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 26, 1934No. 25355Published

1DissentMcNEILL, J.

I am unable to agree with my associates on the question involved in this ease. I cannot follow the judicial romancing through “fig trees,” “thistles,” and “thorns,” and the abuse of executive power in “rewarding friends and purchasing favors from enemies to the utter ruin of the state.” This court should not be concerned with the wisdom, propriety, or expediency of legislative enactments not denied by constitutional authority.

Article 6 of section 10 of the state Constitution provides:

“The Governor shall have power to grant, after conviction, reprieves, commutations, paroles, and pardons for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Day Land & Cattle Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Yeaton and Others, of the Schooner General Pinkney and Cargo v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Norris v. CrockerSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Commonwealth v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API