Legal Opinion

Goux v. St. Tammany Parish Government

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 2014No. 2013 CA 1387PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPettigrew, J.

li>This matter is before us on appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the trial court, overruling their exception raising the objection of no right of action and denying plaintiffs’ request for mandamus relief, with regard to an alleged mapping error on the St. Tammany Parish zoning map. For the following reasons, we reverse, in part, the trial court judgment, and grant mandamus in favor of plaintiffs as discussed in more detail below.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 2007, the St. Tammany Parish Council (“Council”) began a comprehensive re*716zoning of all unincorporated areas of St. Tammany…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoag v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. City of Hammond v. Parish of TangipahoaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Jenkins v. Recovery Technology InvestorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Acadian Ambulance Serv. v. E. Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. ColeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Cole v. ColeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Eclectic Investment Partners, Lp v. City of New Orleans and Norman White, Director of Finance and Ex Officio Tax CollectorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Logan Mills v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and CorrectionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API