Legal Opinion

Sunrise Cooperative v. United States Dep't of Agric.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2018No. 17-3807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Chief Judge.

When Congress speaks clearly, administrative agencies must listen. Congress spoke clearly in the 2008 Farm Bill when it said "an entity that was approved" to provide rebates to its members may continue to do so "in a manner consistent with the payment plan approved." But an agency, under the guise of interpretation, nevertheless imposed additional eligibility requirements on approved entities that are unmoored from the statute. We hold that the agency's interpretation is foreclosed by the statute and reverse the judgment below.

I. BACKGROUND

Sunrise is an Ohio agricultural…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. David Babcock v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
  3. Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Sec'y of the Dep't of Transp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API