Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2007No. SC S55103; SC S55108; SC S55113; SC S55105; SC S55109; SC S55114; SC S55104; SC S55115; SC S55102; SC S55116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

These ten ballot title review proceedings, which we consolidated for purposes of opinion and disposition, are brought under ORS 250.085(2). They concern the Attorney General’s certified ballot titles for four proposed initiative measures that the Secretary of State has denominated as Initiative Petitions 100, 101, 102, and 103 (2008). Each of the proposed measures would amend the Oregon Constitution with respect to political campaign contribution and expenditure limits, as we describe in further detail below.

Petitioners Meyer and Fidanque and petitioners Caruthers and Wolf challenge each of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Fidanque v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Multnomah County v. MehrweinOregon Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API