Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Central R. Co. v. Keegan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 23, 1895No. 878PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

160 U.S. 259 (1895)

CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY

v.

KEEGAN.

No. 878.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted December 8, 1894.

Decided December 23, 1895.

CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Mr. Robert W. De Forest and Mr. George Holmes for plaintiff in error.

Mr. A.G. Vanderpoel for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

We held in Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Baugh, 149 U.S. 368, than an engineer and fireman of a locomotive engine running alone on a railroad, without any train attached, when engaged on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HamblySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Central Railroad Company v. KeeganSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Potter v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Richmond Locomotive Works v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. PrzezdziankowskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API