Legal Opinion

Lorenzo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 8, 1996No. 94-04584Published

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Judge.

We find no error as to Lorenzo’s convictions and therefore affirm. However, we remand for the correction of his sentence in case number CF86-2489 to reflect his credit for time served. Further, we agree with Lorenzo’s argument that the trial court erred in case number CF94-1063 in imposing the $2 discretionary cost pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), without announcing it at sentencing and in imposing the $33 cost/fine without statutory authority. See Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Thus, we strike these costs. Also in case number…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Bourque v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API