Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. Geismar

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 13, 1917PublishedCited by 15 opinions

On appeal from the First District Court of the city of Jersey City.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

On May 15th, 1916, the plaintiff below opened a clothing store on Washington street, in Hoboken. Three days later he was invited to the ma}ror’s office in the city hall. In this suit for slander he avers that then and there the defendant said to the mayor of and concerning him:

“This man, Mr. Finkelstein, is a faker and came to Hobo-ken to fake the public, and his method of doing business is to show an article in the window and when a man comes inside to purchase that article to give him inferior goods in its place. Fie is a disgrace to…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fenning v. SG Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Mick v. American Dental Assn.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Trautwein v. HarbourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Watwood v. Stone's Mercantile Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API