State v. Hussein.

Opinion by

MOON, C.J., Concurring in Part, and Dissenting, in Part, in which NAKAYAMA, J., Joins.

I concur in the majority’s affirmance of Petitioner’s consecutive sentence based upon the application of the presumption that the sentencing court considered all of the factors set forth in Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 706-606 before imposing a consecutive sentence, originally promulgated in State v. Sinagoga,1 81 Hawai'i 421, 918 P.2d 228 (App.1996), overruled on other grounds by State v. Veikoso, 102 Hawai'i 219, 227, 74 P.3d 575, 583 (2003). I cannot, however, agree with the inclusion of the…