Crane v. Farmer
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Arapahoe County Court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott
Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the judgment sought to be reviewed is not appeal-able. The action was one of forcible entry and unlawful detainer, and it is conceded that the judgment rendered does not “amount, exclusive of costs, to the sum of $100, or relate to a franchise or freehold.”
It is clear that the judgment is not appealable, if the Code of Civil Procedure (section 388) is to control. But it is claimed that all actions of this kind are appealable under the act of 1885 relating to forcible entry and detainer. By section 22 of the latter act (p. 230, Sess. Laws…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thorne v. OrnauerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
- Vallette v. San Juan & N. Y. Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Peabody v. ThatcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
- Eckles v. BoocoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harvey v. Travelers Ins.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Sons of America Bldg. & Invest. Ass'n v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Brennan Mercantile Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- County Commissioners v. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1891
- County Commissioners v. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.