Legal Opinion

Williams v. Rudolph

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 14, 2015No. S15A1041PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

Following the partial grant of Rajkumar Rudolph’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Stanley Williams, in his capacity as warden, appeals, contending that the trial court erred by finding that Rudolph had received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Specifically, the habeas court found that Rudolph was harmed by appellate counsel’s failure to challenge the trial court’s decision to charge Rudolph’s jury with the crime of statutory rape as a lesser included offense of rape. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

As set forth in Rudolph’s prior direct appeal,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. FrancisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Lajara v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Battles v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Head v. FerrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lyman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  3. Amos v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  4. Huber v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  5. King v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API