Legal Opinion
People v. Da Forno
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1981PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum of that court (see, also, People v Mason, 48 NY2d 896). Nor will this court take cognizance of the alleged off-the-record plea negotiations on which the defendant seeks to rely (People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 242; People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 528).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. Danny G.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re Benjamin S.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Benjamin Siegel v. State of New York and Edward J. Kuriansky, Deputy New York Attorney General for Medicaid FraudCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- People v. FloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.