Legal Opinion

D'Amico v. City of Baton Rouge

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1993No. Nos. CA/92/0235-C, CA/92/0236-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITCHER, Judge.

Plaintiff, James D’Amico, filed suit against defendant, City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge, seeking payment of the longevity pay increase allegedly due him. The trial court granted a Writ of Mandamus, ordering the Director of Finance to grant the longevity pay increase, and rendered judgment against defendant for the full amount due plaintiff. Defendant filed this appeal. We reverse.

FACTS

Plaintiff, was employed by the Clerk of Court for the Parish of- East Baton Rouge from January 1, 1960, until January 23, 1967. He was then employed by the City of Baton Rouge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pitcher v. Hydro-Kem Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Foster v. HamptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Foster v. HamptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  4. Diaz v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. Brasseaux v. Vermilion Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. La Workers'comp. Corp. v. Genie Indus.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Kelvin Wells v. Ronald Johnson, ET AL.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2025
  3. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2007
  4. State of Louisiana v. Center for Tech and Civic LifeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API