United States v. Philadelphia & R. R.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This case is one of an action for the recovery of the penalty imposed by the act of June 29, 1906. The facts are, as far as the imposition of the penalty is concerned, the same as in *212■case No. 2398, 223 Fed. 202, and in No. 3296, 223 Fed. 207, with these differences: In No. 2398, the defendant company admitted its acts were “knowingly and willfully” done. In No. 3296 the cars were in fact placed opposite the unloading chute within the time limit, but defendant denied ^y willful omission of duty. In the present case the cars were placed on the siding, and in like…