Legal Opinion

Angelo v. Esau

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1939No. Civ. 2254PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

This case presents the familiar picture of injuries resulting from the collision of motor vehicles within the intersection of two highways which cross each other at right angles. The accident occurred northwest of the city of Fresno in the county of that name. Madera Avenue is a paved “through highway” running north and south. McKinley Avenue is an oiled road which crosses it from east to west. The pavement of Madera Avenue is 16 feet wide, and there is a white median traffic line along the center of it. Outside this pavement are graded shoulders on either side. These are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Commonwealth Insurance of New York v. Riverside-Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Freeman v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Pearson & Dickerson Contractors, Inc. v. HarringtonArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bullock v. LukeUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Carlson v. ShewalterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Van Cise v. LencioniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API