Legal Opinion
Hardie v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 2017No. 15-55576PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion and concurrence filed on June 27, 2017, are amended as follows:
1. At page 17 of the slip opinion, delete the sentence: < Perhaps, because of self-selection or other factors, the coaching population differs from the population studied. >.
2. At page 20 of the slip opinion, change <predict the racial effect> to < analyze the racial effect>, and delete con the NCAA’s applicant pool in particular >.
The concurring opinion is amended as follows:
1. At page 28 of the slip opinion, change <Co> to <Co.>.
2. At page 33 of the slip opinion, change cpredict the racial effect of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jennifer Freyd v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Southwest Fair Housing Council v. MdwidCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Freyd v. Univ. of Or.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Bassi v. Mount Airy, No. 1. LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.