Legal Opinion

Joseph R. Thompson v. David E. Groshens and Elmer Lentz

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 6, 1973No. 72-1517PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the district court which denied appellant’s motion for the convening of a three-judge district court and dismissed his complaint, 342 F.Supp. 516. The complaint alleges that Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 18, § 4733, which provides a summary remedy against husbands for support of a wife and children, is unconstitutional. Proceedings brought pursuant to the Pennsylvania statute are pending in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. In an earlier stage of the Commonwealth nonsupport proceeding the appellant made the same challenges to the…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Majuri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  4. Thompson v. GroshensDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Auckland Holmes v. United States Board of Parole and United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. Tayyari v. New Mexico State UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1980
  3. Hartman v. SwitzerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Johnson v. County of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Hartman v. SwitzerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API