Legal Opinion
Sommer v. Rotary Lift Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1932No. 6847PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
An appeal had been taken to this court by the defendant H. C. Sommer from an interlocutory . injunction in a case alleging infringement of a patent owned by the plaintiff . Lunati and licensed to plaintiff Rotary Lift Company. The appeal was allowed by the judge of the District Court who tried the ease and a cost bond in the sum of $250 fixed. The court declined to fix a supersedeas bond and denied the application of the defendant-appellant therefor. Thereupon application was made to Circuit Judge Wilbur of this court for a writ of supersedeas, and the application was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Haberman Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- City of Shelbyville v. GloverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- American Strawboard Co. v. Indianapolis Water Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. H. B. Chalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wymer v. Wymer (In Re Wymer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Wymer v. Wymer (In Re Wymer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1980