Legal Opinion

Wearen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 4, 1990No. 90-154PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court revoked the appellant’s probation on the basis that he was in possession of cocaine, possession of a firearm, and committed a strong-arm robbery. Other than the violation for possession of a firearm, the violation was based only on *1082hearsay testimony, and this was not sufficient. Davis v. State, 510 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Wallace v. State, 440 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Combs v. State, 351 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, one of the grounds for violation being properly established, we affirm the order revoking probation. Casana v. State, 546 So.2d 794 (Fla.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coxon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Combs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Underwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Casana v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Argote v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API