Legal Opinion
John Gary Arredondo v. George Ortiz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 20, 2004No. 01-57166PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
John Gary Arredondo appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Arredondo was convicted by a superior court jury in April 1999 of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury and battery with serious bodily injury in violation of California Penal Code §§ 243(d), 245(a)(1). The only issue before us is whether the trial court violated Arredondo’s Sixth Amendment right to present a defense by refusing to order a witness to testify after the witness invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination as to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Delbert Paulino v. R.A. Castro, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Danta Davis v. Dennis Straub, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer, La County California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Frank D. Frazer v. State of South Carolina Henry Dargan McMaster Attorney General for South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Darrell Anthony Gautt v. Gail Lewis, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.