Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Moore

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 3, 2000No. SC93305PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OVERTON, Senior Justice.

Richard Joseph Donovan has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, section 3(b)(8), Fla. Const.

This is a gain time case related to our decision in State v. Lancaster, 687 So.2d 1299 (Fla.1997), which was vacated by the United States Supreme Court. See Lancaster v. Florida, 522 U.S. 801, 118 S.Ct. 37, 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997). On remand, we reconsidered the case in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997), and decided it in accordance with that decision.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Waldrup v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Meola v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Estate of WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. State v. LancasterSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Tillman v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Biggins v. SnyderDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API