Donovan v. Moore
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OVERTON, Senior Justice.
Richard Joseph Donovan has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, section 3(b)(8), Fla. Const.
This is a gain time case related to our decision in State v. Lancaster, 687 So.2d 1299 (Fla.1997), which was vacated by the United States Supreme Court. See Lancaster v. Florida, 522 U.S. 801, 118 S.Ct. 37, 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997). On remand, we reconsidered the case in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997), and decided it in accordance with that decision.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Waldrup v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Meola v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Estate of WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. LancasterSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Tillman v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Biggins v. SnyderDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020