Legal Opinion

Resource Bankshares Corp. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 11, 2005No. Nos. 04-1946, 04-1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part and reversed in part by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined.

OPINION

GREGORY, Circuit Judge:

On March 8, 2002, Cohen & Malad, LLP, an Indiana limited partnership, sued Resource Bankshares Corporation and Resource Bank (“Resource”) in Indiana state court on behalf of a class of recipients of Resource’s faxes. The lawsuit was based on the private right of action provided by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (2003) (“TCPA”). During the times relevant to the lawsuit, Resource had a series of…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. International Science & Technology Institute, Incorporated v. Inacom Communications, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Buchanan v. DoeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  5. TM Delmarva Power, L.L.C. v. NCP of Virginia, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Resource Bankshares Corporation Resource Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania Erie Insurance Company Federal Insurance Corporation Great Northern Insurance Company, Amici Supporting Resource Bankshares Corporation Resource Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania Erie Insurance Company Federal Insurance Corporation Great Northern Insurance Company, Amici SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API