Legal Opinion
Poindexter v. First State Bank of Richland
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 25, 1923No. 973PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
In this suit, appellee recovered judgment against appellant upon two notes, one for $100, less a credit, and the other for $179. It pleaded that the notes were executed by one Walthall, and that payment thereof was guaranteed by appellant by the three following letters written by him to appellee:
“First National Bank of Wortham, Texas.
“Jan’y 4, 1912.
“Mr. Tom Cox, Cashier, First State Bank, Richland, Texas — Dear Sir: This is to inform you that I hereby agree to guarantee the payment of any and all amounts now due and owing, or to become due to the First State Bank of Richland, Texas, by Roy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Slayden v. PalmoTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MackieTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Gardner v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Waggoner v. ZundelowitzTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Letcher & Moore v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Houston v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Cole v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Cole v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950