Legal Opinion

Rambaut v. Otto

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 1, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

This matter is before the court on exceptions to the report of a special master, to whom reference was made to determine which of two of the defendants, namely, Irving Greenlaw and Electric Specialty Co., Inc., was entitled to a fund deposited in court by complainant. Complainant contracted with defendant Otto for certain improvements on her house, including among other things, an oil burner installation. Otto was paid for his work, except for the oil burner, and it is concerning the value of the oil burner that the present controversy arose. According to the findings of the special master,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. BarbourSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Fish v. HarrisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  3. National Bank of the Metropolis v. SpragueNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API