Legal Opinion

Early & Lane v. Chamberlain

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1880No. 1712, Op. Book No. 2, p. 87Published

Appeal from Robertson County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 920. Surety. “He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it, and he that hateth suretyship is sure.”

§ 921. Indorser; surety; acceptance of. H. was indebted to E. & L. by note past due. He desired an extension of time for the payment of the note, and in order to obtain it presented to M., the agent of E. & L., a new note, with C. as indorser thereon. M. took the note subject to the ratification of E. & 'L. In a few days thereafter M. informed H. that E. & L. would not accept the new note in place of the old one. H. informed O. of this fact. Subsequently, however, E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thornburgh v. MadrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. High v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API