Legal Opinion

Hubert Back v. Danka Corporation Danka Office Imaging Company and Danka Corporation Severance Pay Plan

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2003No. 02-2328MNPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Hubert Back, the plaintiff in this case, worked for twenty-seven years for Danka Corporation, one of the defendants, and its corporate predecessors, Eastman Kodak Company and IBM. In 1997, Mr. Back suffered a work-related injury to his shoulder. He filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. He never returned to active employment. Mr. Back brings this action against Danka and related entities. Two claims are presented on this appeal: wrongful withholding of severance pay, in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conley v. Pitney BowesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chorosevic v. MetLife ChoicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Brown v. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Theresa Wert v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. Van Natta v. Sara Lee Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
  5. Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API