State v. Martin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Defendant Smith contends that the court erred in allowing his wife to testify as a witness against him in the criminal prosecution. While it is true that one spouse may not be a competent witness against the other in a criminal prosecution (State v. Alford, 274 N.C. 125, 161 S.E. 2d 575 (1968)), there are both common law and statutory exceptions to this common law rule, which exceptions have arisen out of unusual factual circumstances.
The instant case is just such an unusual factual circumstance. One who is present, aiding and abetting in a rape actually perpetrated by another…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The People v. DamenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. DropeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Cody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974