In re the Personal Restraint of Pierce
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 This case involves the authority of the Department of Corrections (Department) to deduct funds from an inmate’s trust account. Chad Alan Pierce, a Washington State inmate, filed a personal restraint petition challenging the Department’s collection of costs of incarceration and legal financial obligations (LFOs) from his account. He asserts that his judgment and sentence prohibits the Department from making such deductions. We disagree and hold that the Department has statutory authority to deduct costs of incarceration independent of the judgment and sentence. In addition, the Department…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- In re MeippenWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- In re Pers. Restraint Petition of MeippenWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- In re Pers. Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.