Legal Opinion

Coker v. City of New York Department of Probation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered September 6, 2006, inter alia, granting the petition and declaring that respondent Department of Probation (DOE) acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it terminated petitioner’s employment, and directing that petitioner be reinstated with back pay, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*443As an initial matter, the court’s conversion of respondents’ motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment was proper. In response to the court’s invitation to submit affidavits or any other material it chose, respondents neither…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nassau Boces Central Council of Teachers v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Curtis Properties Corp. v. Greif Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Davila v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Hawkins v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API