Legal Opinion

Foster v. First National Bank of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 28, 1962No. Civ. No. 62-217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOLOMON, Chief Judge.

This case is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a Klamath Indian, filed this action to compel defendant, The First National Bank of Oregon, to pay him approximately $40,000 which the Bank holds in trust for plaintiff under a trust agreement made by the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) pursuant to § 564n of the Klamath Termination Act (Act), 68 Stat. 718 (1954), as amended, 25 U.S. C.A. §§ 564-564x. Plaintiff also seeks a judgment under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202 (1958) declaring § 564n of the Klamath Termination Act unconstitutional.

Th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crain v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. United States National Bank of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
  2. Otradovec v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API