Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Revenue v. Chinchillo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 8, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In December, 1982, Edmund and Rosemarie Chinchillo (taxpayers), residents of Florida, sold real estate in Revere for $725,000. They took a note, secured by a mortgage on the real estate, in payment of all but $25,000 of the *220purchase price. The note provided that principal and interest on the outstanding debt would be payable in monthly installments over the following twelve years. The taxpayers realized capital gain from the sale. Because the sale was an “installment sale” under 26 U.S.C. § 453 (b) (1988), the taxpayers were entitled to and did elect, for Federal income tax purposes, to pay…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. State Tax Commission v. BlinderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Dogon v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Horst v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Revenue v. OliverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Luchini v. AdamsMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API