Legal Opinion

Neat v. Topp

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1912No. 7,509PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Petition by Matilda Topp against John Neat. From a judgment for petitioner, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, P. J.

Error is assigned in tbe action of the court in setting aside a judgment taken by default against appellee. The facts are, in substance, as follows: Appellee sold to one York a lot, the title to remain in appellee until York *513completed a house thereon. Under this agreement to convey, York contracted with appellant to build the house, but when it was completed, and before the final conveyance by appellee, a controversy arose between appellant and York, each claiming that the other owed him money on the building contract, and appellant filed a mechanic’s lien, and began this suit to foreclose…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watson v. Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Beatty v. O'ConnorIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Hoag v. Old People's Mutual Benefit SocietyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Clandy v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knotts v. TuxburyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Marsters v. AshtonOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Barrett v. Oakley, SheriffWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Swartz v. SwartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Delewski v. DelewskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API