Legal Opinion
Jacobs, Bell & Baumol v. Curtis
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 20, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
232 N.J. Super. 155 (1989)
556 A.2d 817
JACOBS, BELL & BAUMOL, A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS FREINT, JACOBS, BELL & BAUMOL, VENTURE MARKETING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND GLORIA M. MATURO, C.P.A., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
GARY CURTIS, KELLY CURTIS AND POSTMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County.
Decided January 20, 1989.
Raphael G. Jacobs for plaintiffs (Jacobs, Bell & Baumol, attorneys).
No appearance by defendants.
SWEEN, J.S.C.
Plaintiffs are judgment creditors who have made application to the court for an order directing that a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Mister Donut of America, Inc. v. Mr. Donut, Inc., Mr. Donut, Inc. v. Mister Donut of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Larry Marshak v. "Doc" Green, John Doe "1", John Doe "2", Bernard Jones, David Rick, and Sandy Wolfe, David RickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Adams Apple Distributing Company, Cross-Appellant v. Papeleras Reunidas, S.A., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Canger v. FroyslandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994