Legal Opinion

People v. Cratsley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1995PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

Defendant was charged with rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [1]) after he admitted to having sexual intercourse with a 33-year-old woman whom he knew to have mental retardation. The sole issue at trial was whether she was legally incapable of consent. 1 While this remains the central question on appeal, an additional issue before us concerns the business records rule.

Complainant, Sherry K., was an employee of the Steuben Association of Retarded Citizens (ARC), a sheltered workshop that provided opportunity and support for adults who are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Leon RRNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Rivers v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. SantiNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. MonicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API