Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1982No. 48378-7PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.

Assault victim, Rachael Conlin, wrote out a statement on a form supplied by a detective of the Pasco Police Department, which contained Miranda warnings, in which she named Nova Smith (defendant) as her assailant. She signed under oath with penalty of perjury before a notary. At Smith's trial a month later, she named another man as her attacker. The trial court allowed her prior inconsistent statement to be used as substantive evidence ruling it was not hearsay under Rule of Evidence 801(d)(l)(i). The jury found Smith guilty of assault in the second degree. Thereafter, the judge granted a new…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. Donald Antonio RagghiantiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Rafael Castro-AyonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. John T. Livingston, United States of America v. David CoyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. State v. JeffersonWashington Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. State v. OttonWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. Binh ThachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Delgado-Santos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. State v. LavarisWashington Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API