Legal Opinion

Russo v. Santini

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 4, 1960No. 3749Published

1Opinion of the Court

Chudoff, J.,

This case raises the question of whether a judgment may be confessed by an attorney on a copy of a note, the original, containing a power of attorney to confess judgment, having been lost, stolen or misplaced.

Although defendants’ petition to strike the judgment, to which plaintiff has filed an answer, alleges facts denying the execution of the instrument, it has been stipulated by and between counsel for plaintiff *648and defendants that the sole question before this court be limited to the authority of the prothonotary to enter judgment on the copy of the note which was filed in this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harper v. Consolidated Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Kros v. Bacall Textile Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Noonan, Inc. v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Connay v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  5. Lansdowne Bank & Trust Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API