Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aaron v. Havens

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 18, 1988No. 70366Published

1DissentRobertson, Judge

The Court’s opinion benignly repeats the long-accepted principle that “[t]he owner of an apartment building has a recognized duty to use due care to make common premises safe, as against foreseeable risks.” (At 447). From this innocent beginning, the Court takes us down a legal road our courts have not traveled before. Because I believe the Court errs in so doing, I respectfully dissent.

Three rationales exist which might support the imposition of the duty of landlords. First, the landlord owes a duty to maintain common areas in a reasonably safe condition. Second, courts may imply “an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sarah B. Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Madden v. C & K Barbecue Carryout, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Virginia D. v. Madesco Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Gaines v. Property Servicing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Ray Kruse Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API