Legal Opinion

Rubino v. Lynaugh

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1989No. 70363PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON CERTIFIED QUESTION FROM THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

2Per curiam

This cause is before us, along with Clay v. Lynaugh, 770 S.W.2d 800 (Tex.Cr.App., delivered this day), on certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, pursuant to Tex.R. App.Pro., Rule 214. The Fifth Circuit held that this Court’s retroactive application of Ex parte McWilliams, 634 S.W.2d 815 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) (Opinion on rehearing), to deprive Rubino of the benefit of the so-called “carving doctrine,” denied him due process and “undermined the constitutional prohibition on ex post facto…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Orosco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. George Anthony Rubino v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Ex Parte EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rios v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Ex Parte ScalesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Marks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. Clay v. LynaughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Guidry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API