Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fenton v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 26, 1987No. WCB 84-02176; CA A40730Published

1DissentWarden, P. J.

Because I disagree with the conclusion of the majority that claimant was en route to the office of her treating chiropractor when she sustained a cervical injury in a collision, I respectfully dissent.

Claimant sustained her injury in May, 1982, when she made a side trip off the public way to Dr. Rabin’s office and into a service station, to obtain gasoline for her vehicle. While she was parked in the station another vehicle backed into hers, causing the injury. Assuming’that claimant’s trip to Rabin’s office for chiropractic treatment of her compensable low back injury was equivalent to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Hill v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co. v. DedmonTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Colwell v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  5. Mills v. Standard Parts Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API